|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() Group: Members
Posts: 3 Joined: 9-February 06 Member No.: 18,440 |
Post
#1
Feb 9 2006, 09:23 PM
This is not about computer but it is still electronic. Has anyone have seen the Anti-Crash Technology in RC planes yet? It uses sensors to "sense" the ground-and-sky orientation of the plane so newbies crash less often. I just have my plane today it ACT works awesome. It's like an autopilot system preventing me from crash and burn!
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 398 Joined: 21-June 05 From: Callifornia Member No.: 8,519 |
Post
#2
Feb 12 2006, 06:18 AM
QUOTE(myspacedirect @ Feb 9 2006, 01:23 PM) [snapback]227802[/snapback] This is not about computer but it is still electronic. Has anyone have seen the Anti-Crash Technology in RC planes yet? It uses sensors to "sense" the ground-and-sky orientation of the plane so newbies crash less often. I just have my plane today it ACT works awesome. It's like an autopilot system preventing me from crash and burn! so have you tired diving it into the ground yet lol? if so what did it do? |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 126 Joined: 10-September 05 Member No.: 11,702 |
Post
#3
Feb 12 2006, 10:47 PM
Is this technology in airplanes. It might help those rare cases of when planes collide mid air. Or if a terrorist hijacks a plane and tries to crash it the plane could automactically avoid collision. Although this probably would stop plane hijackings altogether.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 268 Joined: 10-October 05 From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada Member No.: 12,762 |
Post
#4
Feb 14 2006, 06:02 AM
Sensors and anti-crash software for an RC plane sounds expensive unless you are talking about the large $60,000 RC helecopters that I have seen. This would certainly make RC planes easier to fly. I have one myself, not a very good one because it gets unstable real quick when there is a little wind. @selim: Real planes have a system that is way more complex. In fighter planes for example there is software that can make thousands of adjustments to the plane in one second based on what the sensors tell computers to make sure that the flight is stable. Same thing with passenger planes but on a smaller scale. Your suggestion of having software drive the plane to avoid collision to prevent terrorism is a dangerous idea. Having software drive the plane that you can't override is just asking for disaster, software naturally have glitches except in this case it could mean death. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 1,203 Joined: 25-March 05 Member No.: 4,883 |
Post
#5
Feb 14 2006, 10:24 AM
Oh.. I've seen a model of this technology being built on a remote-controlled toy helicopter in my school. It hardly crashes when the "driver" forces it near the wall, it just simply move backwards like a magnet being repelled or something. The developer also demonstrated how he could land his helicopter without controlling it, allowing it to decent by its own using its sensors. It did successfully and landed slowly with a slight bouncing effect at mid-air, and then landed smoothly. I guess such technology can be implemented to real helicopters and probably aircrafts too. At least it minimises the risks of crashing. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 126 Joined: 10-September 05 Member No.: 11,702 |
Post
#6
Feb 15 2006, 01:19 AM
I didn't mean planes being completely flown by software. I just meant using this bit of technology to prevent collisions. So if the pilot fell asleep and the plane was slowly decending into a mountain then the software would take over and raise the plane so it doesn't crash. And I believe the autopilot is a type of software pilots use to fly planes when little manual input is needed. This software has most likely undergone hundreds of days of testing and simulation to make sure it's safe and if it does make an error the pilot is on hand to switch it off and take control. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 398 Joined: 21-June 05 From: Callifornia Member No.: 8,519 |
Post
#7
Feb 15 2006, 02:20 AM
lol i can bet you they are also trying to make this usable for the goverment so they can program a misson for a plane to fly over say a war zone or somewhere where we need intel... and if it were to be shot down or taken it would not matter as much to get it out of there due to the fact that theres no piolt
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 126 Joined: 10-September 05 Member No.: 11,702 |
Post
#8
Feb 21 2006, 03:51 PM
Doesn't the military already have those unmanned spy planes. I think they are called UAVs. Not sure if thay are in use, although if they were I doubt the military would be making a big deal about it.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 152 Joined: 25-October 06 Member No.: 32,191 |
Post
#9
Jan 13 2007, 02:25 AM
How much it costs compared to normal RC planes? I could get one for myself one day. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 104 Joined: 5-March 08 Member No.: 58,909 |
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
| Topic Title | Replies | Topic Starter | Views | Last Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
12 | Wilson Cook | 969 | 8th June 2006 - 10:19 PM Last post by: Arigato |
|||
![]() |
0 | FlameX | 442 | 31st December 2007 - 01:22 PM Last post by: FlameX |
|||
![]() |
10 | textus | 1,176 | 17th October 2007 - 10:12 PM Last post by: cangor |
|||
![]() |
4 | arijitsinha99 | 2,818 | 28th May 2006 - 12:34 PM Last post by: T100 |
|||
![]() |
2 | Ivan2000bd | 293 | 5th December 2008 - 01:25 PM Last post by: onscreen |
|||
![]() |
12 | timstokman | 1,292 | 28th December 2007 - 03:44 PM Last post by: mahirharoon |
|||
![]() |
5 | shyam | 628 | 18th November 2004 - 09:49 AM Last post by: -Dex- |
|||
![]() |
13 | Becca | 12,551 | 15th April 2005 - 03:41 PM Last post by: beeseven |
|||
![]() |
3 | rovertos | 931 | 9th February 2005 - 06:03 AM Last post by: squishybear |
|||
![]() |
4 | s243a | 763 | 10th December 2004 - 11:43 AM Last post by: antitrust |
|||
![]() |
1,035 | MSTR | 67,477 | 14th December 2008 - 12:15 PM Last post by: Variablez |
|||
![]() |
1 | OmArEmAd | 518 | 4th August 2007 - 02:39 PM Last post by: elaks |
|||
![]() |
2 | HeLLSaTaN | 881 | 23rd January 2005 - 08:12 PM Last post by: joshua132 |
|||
![]() |
2 | bizchina | 753 | 31st December 2004 - 12:03 AM Last post by: Dooga |
|||
![]() |
15 | Cooky | 1,691 | 20th February 2005 - 06:25 AM Last post by: eiteljoh |
|||
|