Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register)



 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 3d Printer That Can Print A 3d Printer
guitar22891
post Jan 9 2008, 05:59 PM
Post #1


Newbie [Level 2]
**

Group: Members
Posts: 31
Joined: 7-January 08
Member No.: 55,898



QUOTE
This is Dr. Adrian Bowyer, who alongside his team of engineers at the University of Bath in England, is working on a project called the RepRap; an open source 3-D printer - a self-replicating machine that will one day be able to print out all of its own parts.

It has been hailed as “the invention that will bring down global capitalism, start a second industrial revolution and save the environment.” Well, maybe. I interviewed Bowyer for the book, and his thoughts on the future of capitalism and society after 3-D printers become widespread are profound. He wonders if the RepRap has the potential to “make a dent in the entire concept of money.”

Perhaps even scarier than the concept of this machine is the recent announcement from RepRap that they will achieve self-replication sometime this year.


View: http://thepiratesdilemma.com/punk-capitali...t-a-3-d-printer

Notice from rvalkass:

Just providing a link is no good. Anything you copy must be put in Quote tags.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
galexcd
post Jan 9 2008, 06:55 PM
Post #2


Define:EVIL PROGRAMMER (ē'vəl prō'grăm'ər)- n. An organism that converts caffeine into evil software.
***********

Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 1,206
Joined: 25-September 05
From: Los Angeles, California
Member No.: 12,251
myCENT:25.62



Devices that can make copies of itself will end civilization as we know it. Read through this article and you'll know what I mean. I'm sure alot of scientists would argue against what the article says but still it makes a lot of sense.

QUOTE
Nano philosophers foresee that one day (some estimate around 2010) it will be possible to create a nano assembler: a man made molecule, that is `programmed' to create certain things out of raw materials. A nano assembler would for instance pick up plain carbon atoms and rearrange them into the molecular structure of a diamond. Or it would make water out of the atomic parts of plain air. Or a cheese sandwich out of dust. Or water into wine, you name it.

This notion is not as weird as it sounds. Our DNA- and RNA-molecules do it all the time! They pick up the raw materials from our food, and turn them into complex molecules. DNA and RNA are nano assemblers that manufacture whole organisms, with arms and legs, and fingers that can type the word `nanotechnology'.

So, if a nano factory can be programmed to create a cheese sandwich out of atoms, why wouldn't it be able to create new nano factories? This in fact is exactly the way it will be, at least according to nanopioneers like K. Eric Drexler. Let's face it: it's a hell of a job to build a nano machine by hand. It would be much easier to make nano machines that are capable of copying themselves, much in the way DNA-molecules replicate themselves. Nano scientists claim it is even essential for a nano machine to be self-replicating. Since they are so tiny, we would need millions of them to be of any use. It would take a lifetime to make them all by hand. Nano factories are thus by definition Von Neumann machines: devices capable of creating new copies of themselves.

But there's a nasty downside. What will such a self-replicating nano machine do if you carelessly tossed it away? You guessed it: it would go on grabbing all atoms within reach, rearranging them into copies of itself. And the copies would make more copies of themselves. And those copies would make even more copies of the copies of the copies. And so on.

No, you just DON'T want to know what this means. Within only 72 hours after the release of the first molecular nano machine, every single atom on earth would be `used' to create new nano machines. In other words, all plants, animals, humans, cars, buildings and even rocks would have been `eaten up' by a vast, exponentially growing army of invisibly small nano devices.


This post has been edited by alex7h3pr0gr4m3r: Jan 9 2008, 06:58 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ironchicken
post Jan 20 2008, 08:19 AM
Post #3


Member [Level 1]
****

Group: Members
Posts: 52
Joined: 26-August 07
Member No.: 48,866



Whoa....Freaky is all I can say.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
A donut
post Jan 20 2008, 09:27 AM
Post #4


Newbie [Level 3]
***

Group: Members
Posts: 43
Joined: 20-December 07
From: Melbourne, AUS
Member No.: 55,017



QUOTE(alex7h3pr0gr4m3r @ Jan 10 2008, 05:55 AM) *
Devices that can make copies of itself will end civilization as we know it. Read through this article and you'll know what I mean. I'm sure alot of scientists would argue against what the article says but still it makes a lot of sense.

Why does that remind me of Prey all of a sudden?

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elhadi
post Mar 12 2008, 12:26 PM
Post #5


Advanced Member
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 104
Joined: 5-March 08
Member No.: 58,909



Whoooooooooooooooooo may be in the future
question:::: can i use it to print an other world or a car or girls...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

Collapse

> Similar Topics

Topics Topics
  1. Set Your Printer To "organs Printing" Mode(6)


 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd December 2008 - 10:48 AM