|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Apr 7 2006, 09:07 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
$p4m 0n j00 $h4m3 m3 0nc3 $p4m 0n m3 $h4m3 m3 7\/\/1c3 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 6,308 Joined: 21-September 04 From: 9r33|\| 399$ 4|\|D 5P4/\/\ Member No.: 1,218 ![]() |
![]() ![]() I put in a little more thought and blending into these photo minips hope you like the first one its of the swiss alps I think and the other one is a lilly. |
|
|
|
Jun 24 2006, 10:05 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Member [Level 1] ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 57 Joined: 22-June 06 Member No.: 25,524 |
The first one-
THe mountains look nice, and the glowy look seems to bring out the colors out a little more. The only thing that's not to good about this is the text. The way you have the two more SAINT-MICHAEL texts with a lower opacity doesn't look to great. Maybe if you made the two other SAINT-MICHAEL texts have a 5 guassian blur or a motion blur going vertically, or something... The second one- This one is great manip. COlors are great and the border look on the flower's petals is great as well. The border is a tad annoying, but still good. |
|
|
|
Jun 25 2006, 10:55 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Privileged Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 630 Joined: 12-August 05 From: Melbourne, Australia Member No.: 10,624 |
Loving the first one Mike, perhaps a little dark in the lower left corner but still excellent. The border is neat and simple, I like it.
The second one I'm not so keen on. The glowing lines above and below the text are fine, but I think the rest of the lines is too much. I'm not a fan of the dimpled border either. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th July 2008 - 06:48 AM |